Kiwi Polemicist

February 8, 2009

• NZ Govt supports Helen Clark for United Nations role

The comments button is at the bottom right of this post.

Dangerous animals should be kept in strong cages

A government press release says that

The New Zealand Government is providing strong support for the candidacy of Helen Clark for the position of Administrator of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

After Herr Helen get a taste of her own jackboot in the last election I thought that she’d get a Comintern/UN job. However, I was hoping that the UN had a post on Mars that they could send her to; they could send Heather Simpson (H2) as well and call the place Sappho.

Helen is clearly the wrong person for the UNDP job. Have a look at this from the press release:

Established in 1965 the UNDP is the most broadly focussed development agency in the UN system. By its mandate, UNDP has programmes in all developing countries, including those in the Pacific and is the largest provider of development assistance in the UN system. UNDP’s work focuses on democratic governance, poverty reduction, crisis prevention and recovery, energy and environment, and HIV/AIDS.

What would the woman who bought in the Electoral Finance Act* and who gave herself much more control over the police and courts know about “democratic governance”?

On the other hand, she’s probably an expert on HIV/AIDS in view of the fact that so many of her friends are homosexuals. Also, she’s definitely an expert on corruption and that is an essential qualification for anyone who wants to work at the UN.

Helen is all for one world government and I’m sure that the job will feed her lust for power. Birds of a feather flock together and I’m sure that she’ll be happy as a pig in muck when mixing with a bunch of totalitarian bureaucrats, handing out crackers to the unwashed proletariat whilst getting paid handsomely with money stolen from taxpayers.

I just wish that the White Witch would vanish into obscurity, or (preferably) vanish altogether. New Zealand should not elevate dangerous animals to positions of power.

What do you think about the idea of Helen working at the UNDP?

**********

* see my post There is no such thing as “human rights”: a classical liberal perspective on the Electoral Finance Act. That post a contains a link to a summary of the law.

~~~~~~~~~~

Advertisements

7 Comments »

  1. I think Helen Clark is really a great lady and she would shine in UN.People can criticise her but it takes guts to be PM of a country like NZ for more than a decade

    Comment by Rajita - graphic design — February 10, 2009 @ 7:57 pm

    • Rajita: I agree that it takes guts to be the PM for nine years, but beyond that we will have to agree to differ.

      Comment by kiwipolemicist — February 10, 2009 @ 9:21 pm

  2. Great post. No, I think after the EFA, and Helen’s interference with the police, courts and Peter Doone etc, her duplicity and deafness to the majority view of the average Kiwi voter, he anti family and religious views, no, and Key should not have endorsed her for the role either. She was corrupt and power hungry as PM, ruined a career or two, loathed anyone who she thought crossed her. Should she be rewarded? No. Probably, she will be, though, as the UN is also a corrupt outfit.

    Comment by Maisy — February 24, 2009 @ 3:46 pm

  3. Sorry, by religous views, I meant to say her reaction to the Exclusive Brethren was very extreme, she seems to dislike the Christian faith, and did not believe in the old fashioned family. Look how crime and lawlessness blossomed, as did wastage of taxpayers money, welfareism and the undermining of the middle classes, good old mum and dad, etc.

    Comment by Maisy — February 24, 2009 @ 3:50 pm

    • Maisy: thank you. Saying she seems to dislike the Christian faith is probably a severe understatement.

      I believe that Helen is a fundamentalist Marxist and that that explains a lot of her actions:

      1) Marxism is based on evolution, which is all about survival of the fittest. That’s a euphemism for and a justification of conquest by force. Hitler, Stalin, and Mao are other examples of this.

      2) For an explanation of her duplicity see this post.

      3) For an explanation of her anti-family agenda see
      this post
      and
      this one.

      4) For an explanation of her anti-christian agenda see this post.

      Comment by kiwipolemicist — February 24, 2009 @ 8:06 pm

  4. […] I said in my earlier post, Helen doesn’t know the first thing about democratic governance so she is clearly unqualified […]

    Pingback by Helen Clark gets UN job « Kiwi Polemicist — March 28, 2009 @ 7:37 pm

  5. […] I said in my earlier post, Helen doesn’t know the first thing about democratic governance so she is clearly unqualified for […]

    Pingback by NZ - Kiwi Polemicist - You are onto it « Equal Parenting @ Ration Shed — March 29, 2009 @ 4:24 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: