On Kiwiblog David Farrar said
There will be plenty of days to disagree with the policies of President Obama, to complain about the media hype. But for me today is not one of them. Today is a day to celebrate a peaceful transition of office in the most powerful country on Earth, and to celebrate Obama’s achievement in becoming the first African-American President.
Apart from the fact that “African-American” is a nonsensical description rooted in pernicious political correctness, this is not a day to celebrate. This is a day to mourn, a day to mourn the fact that a communist and a terrorist is now the worlds most powerful man, the only man capable of projecting significant military force around the globe. That man may also be a closet Muslim. Whilst increased freedom for black Americans is a good thing, that is a trivilality compared to the evil that lies within Obama, and his colour has been used as a means of getting him into power, a point of difference in marketing terms. In my humble opinion the people behind Obama don’t give a stuff about Obama’s colour beyond the fact that it helps them to get their man into power.
So why do I call Obama a communist and a terrorist?
1) In my earlier post I quoted Obama’s Communist/Socialist/Marxist language:
Barack says “Every child in America is our problem, every child in America is our responsibility. That’s not somebody else’s child, that our child”. Back up the Socialist/Marxist bus Barack, children belong to their parents and no one else: you’re trying to justify State interference in the raising of children. This is your variation on “It takes a village to raise a child”.
2) Trevor Loudon says
It is indisputable that US president-elect Barack Obama, has been groomed and supported by radical Marxists almost his entire life.
It is now well known that three Marxist organisations-Communist Party USA (CPUSA), Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism (CCDS)and Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have supported Obama’s political career.
It is also common knowledge that Obama has enjoyed close ties to several former members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and its terrorist splinter, Weather Underground Organisation (WUO).
What is less well known is that all these strands are linked to one entity, an organisation with documented ties to hostile foreign intelligence services-Washington based “think tank” the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS).
Trevor has done a lot more research than I and he is generally considered to a reliable source of information. Note three points from the above:
- Loudon believes that Obama has been groomed – taught – by radical Marxists [Socialists/Communists]
- Obama has close ties to communist and terrorist groups
- those groups have links to hostile foreign powers
3) Terrorists are active supporters of Obama. Birds of a feather flock together, and it is human nature to associate with those people who have a similar world view as ourselves. It is reasonable to conclude that, since Obama is close to such people, he shares their ideology. Furthermore, Marxist ideology advocates revolution – a form of terrorism – so their ideologies are in harmony. Democratic Socialism has covered the iron fist of the Marxist armed revolution with a velvet glove, but that iron fist is no less lethal.
Also, if Obama was anti-terrorism he would not associate with terrorists for fear of harming his political career. Politicians always grovel up to those who share their ideology and will vote for them, whilst shunning those who are repulsive to their electoral base.
I am aware that these are not the strongest arguments I have ever made and I cannot conclusively prove that Obama is a communist and a terrorist. However, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck (#1 above), walks like a duck, and flies with the ducks (#2 & 3 above), then it probably is a duck.
Think of Obama as Helen Clark with more guns and more money then you’ll have the right picture.
What are your thoughts regarding Barack Obama and his ideology?
See also this post about Obama: