Snap quiz: how many ministries does the New Zealand government have, as in Minister of This and Minister for That? I’ve undertaken the herculean task of writing a list: as you read this consider not only the number of ministries, but also which areas of your life (and other people’s) that our slave masters deem it necessary to manage. For the sake of brevity I have written the name of each ministry in the simplest form possible:
- tourism
- finance
- infrastructure
- economic development
- energy & resources
- justice
- state owned enterprises
- commerce
- health
- state services
- environment
- climate change issues
- accident compensation corporation
- police
- corrections
- veteran’s affairs
- education
- tertiary education
- treaty of waitangi negotiations
- arts, culture, & heritage
- agriculture
- biosecurity
- foreign affairs
- sport & recreation
- rugby world cup
- trade
- conservation
- defence
- research, science & technology
- transport
- communications & information technology
- courts
- pacific island affairs
- disarmament and arms control
- disability issues
- youth affairs
- fisheries
- housing
- ethnic affairs
- women’s affairs
- immigration
- broadcasting
- labour
- food safety
- building & construction
- customs
- statistics
- small business
- internal affairs
- land information
- civil defence
- senior citizens
- racing
- local government
- regulatory reform
- consumer affairs
- community & voluntary sector
- revenue
- forestry
- social development & employment
You’ll probably need a cup of tea and a lie down after reading that, but while you’re lying down consider three things:
1) I could dispute the need for each and every one of these ministries, but let’s focus on a few: why on earth do we need to have the government managing arts, culture and heritage, or the community and voluntary sector, or sport and recreation? All together now, say after me: “nanny state”.
2) even if the government does need to manage all these aspects of daily life – a notion that I totally reject – why can’t they combine some of the ministries? E.g., agriculture, forestry, fisheries and biosecurity would be a logical combination, as would police, courts, justice and corrections. Additional combinations can be found with ease.
3) is there an area of your life that the government isn’t trying to manage? Sex, food, housing, money, employment, TV, rugby, the air you breathe and a trip to the art gallery are all covered; keep trying and a post a comment if you can think of one area of your life that isn’t ruled by a government ministry. If you fail to find one area of your life that isn’t managed by the government let me know as well.




I agree there are too many ministries and if I was culling I’d start with the women’s, senior citizens and youth portfolios.
Comment by homepaddock — November 18, 2008 @ 8:00 am
Yes the women’s, senior citizens and youth portfolios would be a good start. After a while people would realise that the country hadn’t sunk beneath the sea without them and we could remove some more fat from the bloated government.
Comment by kiwipolemicist — November 18, 2008 @ 8:14 am
That is a massive list, I had no idea it was so long. That explains why they have to have multiple portfolios – if every minister was an individual MP, almost the entire government would be ministers. That is a bit nutty.
Comment by Mr Dennis — November 18, 2008 @ 11:25 am
Mr Dennis: IMHO having 60 portfolios is more than a bit nutty.
Comment by kiwipolemicist — November 18, 2008 @ 12:31 pm
The women’s affairs one is so paternalistic. It has always grated me the most.
I think I can cut my finger nails without invoking a ministry.
Comment by Madeleine — November 18, 2008 @ 2:27 pm
[...] Kiwi Polemicist has a list of 60 Ministries, given the dire economic outlook a cull would be in order. [...]
Pingback by RIP Rural Affairs Ministry « Homepaddock — November 18, 2008 @ 2:49 pm
Oh no wait. Disposing of the clippings would invoke the Minister for the Environment and maybe ACC if the clippers slipped.
You know John Key could have been really inclusive and given every one of his MP’s a portfolio each – there is enough to go around.
Comment by Madeleine — November 18, 2008 @ 2:50 pm